Monday 27 January 2014

Playing mind games

 
Over the school holidays, my 5-year-old son and I have been playing board games such as Draughts and Chess. Since our abilities are so different at the moment, it's easy for him to become discouraged by losing and to not want to play any more. One approach is to just play easy by letting him win half the time, letting him redo moves when he makes a mistake, and so on. The problem with this is that the gameplay feels artificial, he's not incentivized to play better, and it doesn't end up being particularly challenging or fun for either of us.

So I introduced a handicap system to our games. With Draughts, if I win the game, then I start the next game with one less playing piece. Conversely, if he wins, I add a piece next time. In this way we find an equilibrium where we are roughly equal. I have to play as well as I can to win. He has an incentive to not make simple mistakes. He also gets practice in interesting game positions (such as the end game) and in trying to prevent me getting Kings. He also gets a legitimate sense of achievement when he wins since I'm not just letting him win.

In Chess, our handicap system is similar except he gets to choose the pieces to remove. One interesting aspect for a while is that he was choosing to remove my pawns because he didn't want me promoting them to Queens. I think the system is helping him understand the value of different pieces.

I haven't come up with a similar system for Scrabble yet - we've only played it twice. But interestingly it tests three aspects of learning. First, and obviously, it helps with learning words. It also helps with numbers, since you need to assess word values and add scores. Third, it helps with dexterity, since you need to place your tiles without disrupting the other tiles.

I'm trying to come up with some similar systems for the sports we play, like cricket and soccer. But acquiring a certain minimum level of skill first seems necessary there.

2 comments:

  1. I've lately been playing a strategy game ("Nations") that has two mechanisms to enable fairer competition. The game's basic flow is players collect resources to buy cards, and place workers on the cards to gain more resources.

    The first even-er is a bonus amount of resources after each turn: newer players can receive 2- 4 more, depending on their skill. This seems similar to removal of pieces.

    The second is simplification of the strategy. Some cards are more complex (and marked as such) and can be removed from the game. This reduces the complexity of the game and the strategies required. So in chess this might mean turning knights to bishops and queen to rook.

    With the sports, my hunch is that a separate game structure might be needed for building up the core skills. So a game based around competition of just kicking the ball accurately (with handicaps on accuracy), such as two markers of variable distance apart, and trying to kick it between.



    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Simplifying the chess pieces is a good idea. Also, I could frame the ball kicking as a penalty shoot-out. :-)

      Delete